John 11:25-26 reads:
"Jesus said to her, 'I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this"?
The Case for Christianity: An Interdisciplinary, Evidence-Based Defense
By Coach Larry Weber
Introduction
The claim that Christianity is uniquely true hinges on the historical resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. If the resurrection occurred, then Christianity is not merely one religion among many, but the divine disclosure of God’s plan of redemption. The following case integrates historical, archaeological, philosophical, psychological, and theological evidence. It draws on Scripture, the early Church Fathers, modern philosophy, peer-reviewed research on near-death experiences, and probability theory. It aims to meet the standards of a skeptical academic audience while remaining faithful to Church teachings.
1. Historical Reliability of the New Testament
The New Testament is the most well-attested ancient document. Over 5,800 Greek manuscripts and 20,000 manuscripts in other languages exist, some within decades of the autographs. The earliest fragment (P52, John Rylands Papyrus) is dated c. AD 125, only a generation after composition1. Paul’s creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3–7, delivered within three to five years of Jesus’ crucifixion, is recognized as pre-Pauline tradition even by critical scholars2. This timeline is too short for legend to develop. Richard Bauckham has argued that the Gospels are based on eyewitness testimony3. Luke’s precision has been confirmed by archaeology, accurately referencing 32 countries, 54 cities, and 9 islands4.
2. Archaeological Corroboration
Far from undermining Christianity, archaeology consistently confirms the biblical record:
No archaeological discovery has contradicted a biblical claim10.
3. Prophecy Fulfillment
Jesus fulfilled over 300 Old Testament prophecies. Examples include:
Peter Stoner calculated the probability of eight prophecies being fulfilled by chance as 1 in 10^1711. To illustrate: covering Texas two feet deep with silver dollars, blindfolding a man, and asking him to find one particular coin would approximate the odds of this prophecy fulfillment. Extending this to 48 prophecies results in odds so astronomical they eliminate reasonable doubt.
4. The Resurrection
Gary Habermas and Michael Licona’s “minimal facts” approach identifies facts accepted by most scholars:
Alternative explanations fail to account for all facts. N.T. Wright concludes the bodily resurrection remains the best historical explanation13.
5. Non-Christian Corroborations
Critics of Christianity confirm core facts:
6. Martyrdom of the Apostles
The apostles gained no wealth or power; most died as martyrs for their testimony. This willingness to die supports sincerity: no one dies for what they know to be false19.
7. Near-Death Experiences and the Soul
Peer-reviewed studies support consciousness beyond brain function:
The Church does not yet have an official teaching on NDEs but advises prudence and discernment, acknowledging their importance in exploring the human soul.
8. Philosophical Arguments
Moral Argument: Objective morality exists and rests in God’s eternal nature23.
Fine-Tuning Argument: The odds of a life-permitting universe are extremely small, suggesting design over chance24.
9. Early Church Fathers
Eyewitness-linked Fathers affirm the resurrection within a generation of the apostles:
10. Convergence of Evidence
The convergence of manuscript reliability, archaeology, prophecy fulfillment, eyewitness testimony, NDE studies, moral philosophy, and patristic witness provides a compelling, cumulative case for Christianity unmatched by rival worldviews.
Conclusion
Christianity rests on historical bedrock: Jesus was crucified, buried, and rose from the dead. Early eyewitnesses proclaimed this truth under persecution. Archaeology and philosophy support it. Modern medical science lends credibility to the soul’s transcendence. To deny this requires more faith in chance than belief itself.
As Augustine said:
“Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore, seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand” (Confessions I.1)29.
Endnotes
Near Death Experience Scientific Studies
I did not have time to share scientific evidence for some near-death experiences in this article. One of the best sites for scientific evidence of true Near-Death Experiences is run by the former President of Gonzaga University here: The Definitive Guide to Near-Death Experiences
The guide is from the Magis Center | Science, Reason, and Faith site where Faith, Reason, and Science are discussed. The site is recognized as the meeting point of faith, reason, and science.
Church doctrine unequivocally affirms the existence of a divine designer responsible for all of creation.
How can you see a picture like this and not see the hand of God in it's design?
Image Credit: NASA
Witnessing the birth of one's child is undeniably a profound miracle, a testament to the divine work of God.
There are skeptics who debate the accuracy of probability calculations, journalists who dismiss the accounts of the 500 witnesses to Jesus' resurrection, and individuals who question every aspect of God, regardless of the evidence presented.
This cycle of disbelief will likely continue for some segment of the population in future generations, no matter how overwhelming and accurate the evidence for Christ may be.
The key point is this: when you witness the birth of your child, you can see the hand of God at work. No additional evidence or data is necessary.
I rest my case.